Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4581360
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T20:54:56+00:00 2026-05-21T20:54:56+00:00

Is it really necessary to wrap structs/classes with Boost.Fusion in order to use them

  • 0

Is it really necessary to wrap structs/classes with Boost.Fusion in order to use them with Boost.Spirit V2.x (especially Boost.Spirit.Qi)? I would much rather use semantic actions to assign to members. If my memory serves me well, this is the way it used to be done in V1.x…

The calculator example suggests that it should still be possible. So far, I haven’t found a nice way to do it.

I would like to see how you would do it in the employee example. The following doesn’t compile, but maybe there is some way to make it work:

template <typename Iterator>
struct employee_parser : qi::grammar<Iterator, employee(), ascii::space_type>
{
    employee_parser() : employee_parser::base_type(start)
    {
        using qi::int_;
        using qi::lit;
        using qi::double_;
        using qi::lexeme;
        using ascii::char_;

        quoted_string %= lexeme['"' >> +(char_ - '"') >> '"'];

        start =
            lit("employee")
            >> '{'
            >>  int_[px::bind(&employee::age, qi::_val) = qi::_1] >> ','
            >>  quoted_string[px::bind(&employee::surname, qi::_val) = qi::_1] >> ','
            >>  quoted_string[px::bind(&employee::forename, qi::_val) = qi::_1] >> ','
            >>  double_[px::bind(&employee::salary, qi::_val) = qi::_1]
            >>  '}'
            ;
    }

    qi::rule<Iterator, std::string(), ascii::space_type> quoted_string;
    qi::rule<Iterator, employee(), ascii::space_type> start;
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T20:54:57+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:54 pm

    Nevermind, I still had the old fusion printing stuff in there. Funny how mistakes become so much easier to find after you have posted the question… 🙂

    (Since this works, I must have made another error in the production code.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it really necessary to use the 'extends BoardGame'? If I remove it my
Is it really necessary to release COM components from Office PIA, when you don't
Are hints really necessary for every sql statement? We have a dba who is
I was wondering if it is really necessary to validate in both JS and
I'm developing an Android application. I'm wondering if it really necessary to create objects
Update: It's not really necessary to remove added scripts considering once they run you
I'd like to know if its really necessary escape my string with htmlentities($str, ENT_QUOTES,
As the question suggests, is providing the WSDL really necessary, or is it more
Possible Duplicate: Why does asynchronous delegate method require calling EndInvoke? Is Delegate.EndInvoke() really necessary?
Really simple question - how do I do a search to find all records

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.