Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6697703
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T06:29:28+00:00 2026-05-26T06:29:28+00:00

Is it still useful in VB.NET to assign objects to Nothing when finished using

  • 0

Is it still useful in VB.NET to assign objects to Nothing when finished using them, as mentioned here? Or has garbage collection improved to the point that this is no longer helpful/necessary?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T06:29:29+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:29 am

    As the others said, it’s not necessary in most cases.

    If you are done using an object and want to claim its memory as soon as possible (for example, because it’s a very big entity which contains many others), make it implement the Disposable pattern and use it via the Using directive.

    In the particular case in which your big object does not reference any unmanaged resource, this is not fixing a memory leak, it’s keeping your memory footprint small

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There is a website made using .net, the maker has gone and we can't
Should you set all the objects to null ( Nothing in VB.NET) once you
The code-complete feature in Visual Studio is very useful, and it still works for
Here comes a requirement and i'm still at the beginning of choosing jQuery treeview
I'm using CC.Net 1.4.4.83 to build my project. I also have some scheduled tasks
I have been working with Visual Studio (WinForm and ASP.NET applications using mostly C#)
I have a couple of solutions, but none of them work perfectly. Platform ASP.NET
.NET 4 introduces covariance. I guess it is useful. After all, MS went through
Are HTML entities still useful or should I simply create UTF-8 encoded html documents?
If array inherits from object, is binary searching still useful/quick?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.