is it true that if we make any site in any cms, it may become heavy to load…
static html page VS page where content coming from databse
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
is it true that if we make any site in any cms, it may become heavy to load…
static html page VS page where content coming from databse
It will take longer to serve pages from a database-based CMS than from a static HTML file on disk. However, most modern CMSes will mitigate this by providing some kind of cache. For example, the WordPress Super Cache plugin will cache your WordPress pages as static HTML and serve those, refreshing them when content changes, and takes only a few minutes to set up.
For my money, for anything other than trivial sites, the benefits of a CMS, with a cache system — easy user updating, less repeating your code, still quite fast to load, etc. — outweigh the costs.
There are also CMSes that you use locally, and then “burn” a set of static HTML files for upload, so you get the advantages of CMS management but the speed of static files, for example the Ruby-based nanoc.