Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6728253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T10:08:53+00:00 2026-05-26T10:08:53+00:00

Is it true that javax.inject annotations can function as direct replacements for com.google.inject? So

  • 0

Is it true that javax.inject annotations can function as direct replacements for com.google.inject?

So that, if I replaced all my current guice/gin annotations with those from javax.inject, my app would compile and run just fine?

First, does javax.inject cover all the bases that google.inject cover?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T10:08:53+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:08 am

    Yes, it will work fine. In fact the author of guice (Bob Lee) is a spec-lead for the javax.inject specification.

    javax.inject.Inject does not have the optional attribute, so if you want an optional dependency, you’d have to use the guice annotation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it true that the only way to handle default function arguments is through
Is it true that the smallest amount of memory that I can allocate in
Is it true that you cannot use COM Interop to expose COM properties? Everything
Is it safe to assume that java.util.concurrent.CompletionService.take().isDone() will always return true? If so, why
is it true that Rails depend on cookies? It seems that flash is a
Is it true that a service written in C# is unable to give visual
Is it true that any REST based API to upload videos will always require
Is this true that Update SQL Query is slow because of Clustered index??????
Is it true that the syntax for (assign of variable value) is different than
Is it true that the following yields undefined behavior: void * something = NULL;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.