Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 541953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:23:47+00:00 2026-05-13T10:23:47+00:00

Is it wise to use the object id as a hash key (via. the

  • 0

Is it wise to use the object id as a hash key (via. the __hash__) to be able to hash an otherwise mutable object for a single instance of a program? Using the object attributes would be nicer but they’re all mutable and can change.

This occurred to me while looking at Sets of instances and I’m wondering if it’s wise.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:23:47+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:23 am

    Yes, as long as you also define __eq__ (and presumably __ne__!-) consistently with that. IOW, it’s fine, as long as you’re fine with a==b meaning exactly the same as a is b!-)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it wise to use Domain Administrator as a SQL Windows Authentication log-in?
I'm wondering if there is a difference performance wise between using COUNT(*) and COUNT(date_created)
Which Timer object should I use in long running processes in .Net? The timer
Is it OK to use the constructor to set properties for a value object
How can I use jQuery to get a particular instance of a class(headerGrid) within
I have a product image class. This is an object with re-use potential for
With this schema: create table object ( obj_id serial primary key, name varchar(80) not
Both these ways work using the same call mechanism. Obviously, I want to use
Design wise and performance wise which approach is recommended for handling multiple Zeromq sockets
oh wise list, We need a scalable solution that can handle many concurrent requests

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.