Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 705705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:05:01+00:00 2026-05-14T04:05:01+00:00

Is loading only the needed classes directly a good way of reducing the overall

  • 0

Is loading only the needed classes directly a good way of reducing the overall memory usage of a Java application?

For example:

import java.awt.Graphics;

vs

import java.awt.*;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:05:01+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:05 am

    No. You should import only the needed classes to make it clear to programmers which classes are actually needed by your class.

    Import statements just tell the compiler where to look for the classes you are using – it doesn’t mean all the classes in the package are loaded into memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In my application I use only WebView for loading index.html where running all app
I am loading a JS file needed only for one part of my web
Goal: Load Ext Framework (JS File) only when needed. Problem: When loading Ext.JS at
Is it possible I can load an image sprite only when needed? For example
Are there any editors that can edit multi-gigabyte text files, perhaps by only loading
I'm loading a stylesheet that is only required when javascript is enabled. More to
This only happens in IE. I'm using swfobject and loading the flash vars as
I just found out that lazy loading in Entity Framework only works from the
I am having a problem with loading JS in IE. My document ready only
Loading images into Flex (size < 100kb) causes IE7 memory increase by a megabyte

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.