Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7575069
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T16:35:40+00:00 2026-05-30T16:35:40+00:00

*/** is read by my brain as Give me everything in this directory and

  • 0

*/** is read by my brain as “Give me everything in this directory and everything in it’s directories, then EVERYTHING in all of their nested directories.” But by that definition, ** should just give me the entire tree and it is two characters shorter. Since ** does not work this way, my definition is obviously flawed.

Is there an English translation of */** that better describes what it is actually doing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T16:35:41+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 4:35 pm

    I’d translate it as “Match all contents recursively of subdirectories of the current directory”. The difference from using ** straight away is that this pattern does not match non-directories inside the current directory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I feel that this is something I should know, but does a java agent
I read various post's prior to this. but none of them seemed to work
I know this is simple but my brain is fried from trying to solve
I'm sure this is a really simple, obvious answer, but my brain is fried
First of all, I want to say sorry for this very big question, but
This is quite a complicated and brain busting question, so please read carefully and
I tried a few things but this week i feel like my brain's having
Read on before you say this is a duplicate, it's not. (as far as
Read about the issue in this stackoverflow question . Still have the same issue
I read the example on Passing multi-dimensional arrays in C on this site. It

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.