Question

Is setX() method name appropriate for only for setting class property X?

For instance, I have a class where the output is a string of an html table. Before you can you can call getTable, you have to call setTable(), which just looks at a other properties and decides how to construct the table. It doesn’t actually directly set any class property — only causes the property to be set. When it’s called, the class will construct strHtmlTable, but you can’t specify it.

So, calling it setTable breaks the convention of get and set being interfaces for class properties.

Is there another naming convention for this kind of method?

Edit: in this particular class, there are at least two ( and in total 8 optional ) other methods that must be called before the class knows everything it needs to to construct the table. I chose to have the data set as separate methods rather than clutter up the __construct() with 8 optional parameters which I’ll never remember the order of.

Answer 1

I would recommend something like generateTable() instead of setTable(). This provides a situation where the name of the method clearly denotes what it does.

I would probably still use a setTable() method to actually set the property, though. Ideally, you could open the possibility of setting a previously defined table for further flexibility.