Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 140167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:33:57+00:00 2026-05-11T07:33:57+00:00

Is specifying a field name on middle-tier a leaky abstraction? I feel it is

  • 0

Is specifying a field name on middle-tier a leaky abstraction?

I feel it is too cumbersome to create a separate function just for each field, even if it is code-generated.

        public bool Assortment_IsValueExistingOnOtherRecord(             Dictionary<string, object> exceptPkColumns,             string field, object value             )         {             var c = Connect();              var dt = new DataTable();              string sanitizedField = field.Replace(''','');              var daAssortment = new SqlDataAdapter(                string.Format( @'SELECT 1 FROM assortment WHERE  /* do I violate any good programming practice here? */ [{0}] = @value  AND NOT (assortment_id = @assortment_id)',  field), c);              daAssortment.SelectCommand.Parameters.Add('assortment_id', exceptPkColumns['assortment_id']);             daAssortment.SelectCommand.Parameters.Add('value', value);             daAssortment.Fill(dt);              return dt.Rows.Count == 1;         }  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:33:58+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:33 am

    From an encapsulation perspective, there is nothing wrong with what you wrote.

    However, as ‘David B’ alluded to (he was a little vauge about it), there are some security issues you need to be aware of.

    The dynamic SQL you are generating is subject to something called a ‘SQL Injection attack’. Imagine, for example, that the value of field was the following string:

    assortment_id] = 0 and assortment_id = 1  delete from assortment select 1 from assortment where [assortment_id 

    this would result in the database executing 3 queries:

    1. A dummy select query that brought back no results
    2. A delete query that deleted everything in the assortment table
    3. A real select query

    That could, obviously, cause some problems.

    If the value of ‘field’ is ever specified via:

    1. A user interface field
    2. A web page form submission
    3. From a web service client
    4. Loaded from a file on disk
    5. Or in any way other than a constant value supplied by you in code

    Then you need to validate the data to make sure it is a valid field value before running any queries. Otherwise you are vulnerable to attack.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For example if I have an auto-numbered field, I add new records without specifying
I've configured several headers in the mail() function, sender name and other fields appear
When name of a field-like event SomeNews is used inside a class that declares
I'm trying to achieve something like this by dynamically specifying the fields: my_model.objects.values('id', 'name')
I have the following select field in a form: { xtype: 'selectfield', name: 'minprice',
How would I Export tables specifying only certain fields? I am using mysql 5.0
When specifying a date format for the jQuery UI datepicker YY is a 4
By specifying -lib foo.jar to ant I get the behaviour that the classes in
I'm specifying my doctype as xhtml strict, but it's being sent over the wire
I have requirement of specifying web part connections in onet.xml. So when site is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.