Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8952733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T13:56:23+00:00 2026-06-15T13:56:23+00:00

Is the following class thread safe? I am worrying about concurrent read and write

  • 0

Is the following class thread safe? I am worrying about concurrent read and write the initialized variable. If it is not thread safe, how to make it thread safe?

  1. I know convert methodA to synchronized will help, but I don’t want to do this
  2. How about add volatile keywork to “initialized” variable?
public class A {

    private boolean initialized;

    public synchronized void init(String configFilePath) {
        if (initialized) {
            return;
        }

        initialized = true;
    }

    public void methodA() {
        if (!initialized) {
            throw new ConfigurationException()
        }
    }
}

Update1:
The initialized variable will only be modified once in init method, all other methods will only ready. If that is the case, adding volatile to initialized will make it thread safe, is that correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T13:56:24+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 1:56 pm

    No, it is not thread safe. The init routine could be in the middle of setting initialized when methodA is called. Since methodA is not synchronized, there’s nothing preventing a race between executing initialized = true and the read in if( !initialized). In fact, the write could even have happened but simply not yet propagated to the thread that called methodA

    Adding volatile to initialized would help with the value propagation problem, but not with the first.

    For more info on this, I recommend Brian Goetz’s article Managing Volatility.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read that the following class is not thread safe since threads could read
The following class is not thread-safe (as proven in Proving the following code not
How can I quickly prove that the following class is not thread-safe (as it
I want to know if the following class is thread safe and works perfectly
Consider following code, I want to make it a thread safe class, so that
I have read Java String class is immutable and thread-safe but I am still
Is the following object thread safe? I'll make one instance and use it using
I am trying to write a thread safe logger class so that i can
Is the following code thread safe when using boost shared_ptr. Thanks! class CResource {
I have a class which is not thread safe: class Foo { /* Abstract

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.