Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8129225
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T08:13:39+00:00 2026-06-06T08:13:39+00:00

Is the following code safe? class B { public: int& b; B (int& _b)

  • 0

Is the following code safe?

class B {
  public:
    int& b;
    B (int& _b) :
      b(_b) {}
};

B* foo() {
  int a;
  return new B(a);
}

Will the reference in the object returned by foo point to nothing (since int a is going out of scope) or does the compile figure this out?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T08:13:40+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 8:13 am

    The compiler might warn you, but the newly created object definitely contains a dangling, invalid reference, as the object a stops existing at the end of the scope of foo.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In the following code: public class StringCache { private readonly object lockobj = new
I was wondering, whether the following code are safe. public class GUIBundle { //
When I compile the following code using g++ class A {}; void foo(A&) {}
Consider following code public class City { public string Name { get { return
The following class is not thread-safe (as proven in Proving the following code not
I'm curious if following code would be considered safe? using (SqlConnection cn = new
Suppose I write the following code: public ref class Data { public: Data() {
To get my code to compile - which contained the following: public class ContactsActivity
Is the following code thread safe when using boost shared_ptr. Thanks! class CResource {
Consider the following Safe program: internal class Safe { public static void SafeMethodWillNeverThrow() {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.