Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8185729
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T01:56:59+00:00 2026-06-07T01:56:59+00:00

Is the following code thread-safe? Do I really need to set dataReady to be

  • 0

Is the following code thread-safe? Do I really need to set dataReady to be volatile, though there is only one write and multiple reads from one thread (with while loop as shown below)?

public class MyApplication extends Application
{
    /* a flag indicates if the data is fully retrieved from the database */
    private volatile boolean dataReady = false;

    @Override
    public void onCreate()
    {
        super.onCreate();

        new AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void>()
        {
            @Override
            protected Void doInBackground(Void... params)
            {
                // retrieve data from the database
                return null;
            }

            @Override
            protected void onPostExecute(Void result)
            {
                dataReady = true;
            }
        }.execute();
    }

    public boolean isDataReady()
    {
        return dataReady;
    }
}

On other thread (not the main thread):

while(!getApplication().isDataReady()); // wait until the data is ready
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T01:57:01+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 1:57 am

    Marking the boolean as volatile guarantees visibility, in other words it guarantees that all threads will see its current value. Since you are making writes and reads in different threads, you have to mark the boolean as volatile.

    If you don’t mark it as volatile, it is very possible (but not systematic) that your main thread will set dataReady to true and the other thread will see the flag as false and continue looping. In a worse case scenario, it could even become an infinite loop.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following code. Will it be thread safe even if the set
I'm using the following code to set Control properties in a thread-safe manner: private
The following class is not thread-safe (as proven in Proving the following code not
I'm currently using the following code for thread-safe access of a variable. int gnVariable;
Background I am assuming the following code is completely thread safe: // Called from
Is the following code thread safe: THREAD A std::vector<std::string> myCopy; with_locked_mutex(m) { myCopy =
How is the following demo code thread-safe? We are ensuring whether the value is
Given the J5+ memory model (JSR-133) is the following code thread-safe and permissible? And
The following code is thread-safe as far as I can tell, with the caveat
Is the following code thread-safe? I assume it is because strings are immutable. (Code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.