Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 595181
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:02:02+00:00 2026-05-13T16:02:02+00:00

Is the following legal C++ code: class C { static public int x; };

  • 0

Is the following legal C++ code:

class C 
{
     static public  int x;
};

It compiles OK in Visual Studio 2008 C++ and Visual Studio 2010 C++ (beta 2). But the static member x does not end up being public.

In Visual Studio 2010 beta 2 the experience is even stranger. Intellisense reports an error “expected an identifier”, but the compiler does not. Visual Studio 2008 does not give any error.

So the questions are:

Is this legal C++ code?
What does it mean?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:02:02+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:02 pm

    This is not legal C++. It is a legal C#, so that’s why MS IDE bugged out.

    Correct:

    public: static int x;

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is the following code legal in C++. Accessing a friend class member public method?
// following code works fine n open notepad... class demo { public static void
Is the following code the case of legal forward referencing? if yes why? public
Specifically, is the following legal C++? class A{}; void foo(A*); void bar(const A&); int
Following is my Model for Product public class Product { public int Id {
Is the following code legal? std::string&& x = hello world; g++ 4.5.0 compiles this
Is this legal? If not, will the following code allow this? class Foo {
Is the following code legal according to C99? ... for(....) { int x =
Is the following code legal? int add(int a, int b) { return a +
The following code is illegal: public struct MyStruct { public MyStruct(int a, int b)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.