Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4618198
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T02:13:55+00:00 2026-05-22T02:13:55+00:00

Is the java API PriorityQueue constructor that takes another priority queue destructive to the

  • 0

Is the java API PriorityQueue constructor that takes another priority queue destructive to the argument? If so, is its clone() method adequate for creating a shallow copy?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T02:13:56+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:13 am

    No, it is not destructive. Pretty much all the collection classes have copy constructors, and are non-destructive by convention.

    The reason there are overloaded constructors is for efficiency; when a PQ or SortedSet is supplied, one can imagine that the initial population of elements can be O(n) instead of O(n log n)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am calling a vendor's Java API, and on some servers it appears that
as I googled for problem, somehow java printing API is crippled with limitation that
Take the PriorityQueue for example http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/PriorityQueue.html#offer(E) Can anyone give me an example of a
What C++ library provides Data structures API that match the ones provided by java.util.*
Any Java API in client side can check its modified date?
The old, more or less deprecated java.io.File API had a method exists which returned
I'm using an API that makes heavy use of Iterables (java.lang.Iterable), but I can't
To recap for those .NET gurus who might not know the Java API: ConcurrentHashMap
I'm currently looking for ways to create automated tests for a JAX-RS (Java API
The JPA (Java Persistence API) specification has 2 different ways to specify entity composite

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.