Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8703865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T02:57:45+00:00 2026-06-13T02:57:45+00:00

Is the order of the elements within an std::list guaranteed to remain in-order (unless,

  • 0

Is the order of the elements within an std::list guaranteed to remain in-order (unless, of course, a sort or something occurs)?

Moreover, is there any potentially undefined behavior with lists that might jumble them up?

I was/am under the impression that containers such as std::deque and the like are order-safe, but alas std::deque is not double-linked.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T02:57:46+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:57 am

    Yes the order is guaranteed in std::list. Since anything can happen with UB, mixing up the order of a std::list is possible (though unlikely I would think).

    Short answer is that if your lists are not in the order you think they should be then the most likely reason is a bug in your program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is the order of the elements in jQuery wrapped set guaranteed to match the
Is there a better way to select grandparent elements in jQuery in order to
I have an xml document with three child elements repeating in any order. I
I have two lists with 8 list elements within each one. I would like
Given a List<T> in c# is there a way to extend it (within its
Possible Duplicate: Elements order - for (... in ...) loop in javascript Assume you
I am looking for a Java framework which can validate order of elements in
Before suggesting bin packing algorithms, they assume you can re-order the elements and arrange
Does the standard guarantee that order of equal elements will not change (eh, forgot
I want to understand in which order are the elements of h_addr_list sorted when

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.