Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6551063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T12:17:28+00:00 2026-05-25T12:17:28+00:00

Is the @Qualifier annotation needed at all? Can’t we just inject an instance of

  • 0

Is the @Qualifier annotation needed at all? Can’t we just inject an instance of particular type? It seems like a little extra work, since we have to create annotation type for each implementing class. To show what I mean, here is the example below:

@Documented
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Qualifier
public @interface AppleQ { }

@Documented
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Qualifier
public @interface CheeseQ { }

public interface Eatable { }

@AppleQ
public class Apple implements Eatable { }

@CheeseQ
public class Cheese implements Eatable { }

public class Breakfast {
  @Inject @AppleQ Eatable somethingToEat;
}

vs

public interface Eatable { }

public class Apple implements Eatable { }

public class Cheese implements Eatable { }

public class Breakfast {
  @Inject Apple somethingToEat;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T12:17:29+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:17 pm

    You are (kind of) right, your example works without qualifiers. But its rather that your example is a bit misleading than that you don’t need qualifiers.

    In general, you will need qualifiers whenever you have have more than one managed bean of a certain type eligible for injection. This is not the case in your example, but would easily be if you wrote your code like this:

    public class Breakfast {
      @Inject Eatable somethingToEat;
    }
    

    (This gives you the flexibility to change your implementation later, for the same reason as you normally write List list = new ArrayList())

    You will not need qualifiers if you have just one managed bean of a certain type eligible for injection.

    More serious examples where you want to use qualifiers would look like this:

    Imagine you want have a class Locale in your system. Using different qualifiers (together with different producer methods) would allow you to write code like this:

    ...
    @Inject
    @DefaultLocale
    Locale theDefaultLocale;
    ...
    @Inject
    @StandardLocale
    Locale theStandardLocale;
    ...
    @Inject 
    Instance<Locale> allLocales;
    ...
    

    To summarize: You need qualifiers if and only if you have more than one bean of a type. This makes qualifiers redundant for the overwhelming majority of you beans – but you will certainly need them.

    All this and much more is best read here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Spring has its own Qualifier annotation, I think it's equivalent to the javax.inject.Named annotation,
Is it correct that one can create spring beans using just the @Component annotation
Our static analysis tool complains about a useless type qualifier on return type when
How can I generate a assembly qualified type name? For an example, when configuring
I am trying to implement sql LIKE qualifier with placeholders for a set of
I have something like this: class MyBean { @Autowired @Qualifier(jdbcTemplate) @BeanProperty var jdbcTemplate :
I keep on getting this error error: expected specifier-qualifier-list for core data code im
I have what seems to be a simple problem, as stated in the title.
There is a @Bean annotation in Spring 3.0. It allows to define a Spring
I would like to use two different implementations for a DAO with Spring's testframework.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.