Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 781363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T20:13:06+00:00 2026-05-14T20:13:06+00:00

is the ruby mysqlplus adapter production ready? have a choice between: 1. mysql library

  • 0

is the ruby mysqlplus adapter production ready?

have a choice between:
1. mysql library by tmtm (has a pure ruby and c version)
2. mysqlplus by http://github.com/oldmoe/mysqlplus/
3. dataobjects (used my datamapper ORM)
4. em-mysql

Currently using the C version of the mysql gem, that is the oldest and most popular option.
Evented programming is hard, invasive and is a paradigm-shift so that rules out em-mysql 🙂

How mature are dataobjects and mysqlplus, was more interested in mysqlplus due to its concurrent driver.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T20:13:06+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:13 pm

    I am the maintainer of DataMapper, and we’ve been using DataObjects under the hood for several years.

    It is production ready. In many ways it is further along than most of other ruby drivers. It supports MRI, JRuby and even Rubinius. It had full Ruby 1.9 coding support very early on. It works with Ruby 1.8.6 to 1.9.2. It has non-blocking support. It handles typecasting of values without any intermediary steps (so the data doesn’t come out as a String to be coerced into another ruby type; it comes back as the type directly). It has a unified API between all the DB drivers it supports (currently sqlite, mysql, postgresql, oracle, sqlserver, h2, hsql and derby).

    Actually there’s a rubysoc project to port AR/ARel to work with DO, and there’s a chance it could become the default driver for ActiveRecord.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ruby has two different exceptions mechanisms: Throw/Catch and Raise/Rescue. Why do we have two?
Ruby has a wealth of conditional constructs, including if / unless , while /
Ruby on Rails has magic timestamping fields that are automatically updated when a record
Ruby on Rails has a lot of ways to generate JavaScript. Particularly when it
Ruby on Rails controllers will automatically convert parameters to an array if they have
Ruby setters—whether created by (c)attr_accessor or manually—seem to be the only methods that need
Ruby's standard popen3 module does not work on Windows. Is there a maintained replacement
Ruby on Rails does not do multithreaded request-responses very well, or at least, ActiveRecord
Ruby can add methods to the Number class and other core types to get
Ruby is truly memory-hungry - but also worth every single bit. What do you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.