Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1049107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:33:47+00:00 2026-05-16T16:33:47+00:00

Is there a better/easier way to create a \w+ string from an existing string?

  • 0

Is there a better/easier way to create a \w+ string from an existing string?

 char *FixName(char *name)
 {
     char *ptr, tmp;
     char *new = malloc(strlen(name)+1);
     sprintf(new, "str_");
     for (ptr = name + 4; *ptr; ptr++)
     {
         if ((*ptr >= '0' && *ptr <= '9') ||
             (*ptr >= 'A' && *ptr <= 'Z') ||
             (*ptr >= 'a' && *ptr <= 'z') ||
             *ptr == '_')
         {
             tmp = *(ptr+1);
             *(ptr+1) = '\0';
             strcat(new, ptr);
             *(ptr+1) = tmp;
         }
     }
     free(name);
     return new;
 }

 // USAGE:
 //char *j = strdup("str_[](1.00)");
 //printf("J: %s\n", j);
 //j = FixName(j);
 //printf("J: %s\n", j);
 //free(j);
 // OUTPUT:
 //J: str_[](1.00)
 //J: str_100

Thanks for comments, new function:

  void FixName(char *name)
  {
      char *ptr;
      unsigned short count = strlen("str_");
      for (ptr = name + count; *ptr; ptr++)
      {
          if ((*ptr >= '0' && *ptr <= '9') ||
              (*ptr >= 'A' && *ptr <= 'Z') ||
              (*ptr >= 'a' && *ptr <= 'z') ||
              *ptr == '_')
          {
              *(name+count) = *ptr;
              count++;
          }
      }
      *(name+count) = '\0';
  }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:33:48+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:33 pm

    One thing you could do to immediately make your code much clearer is to use character literals:

    if ((*ptr >= '0' && *ptr <= '9') ||
        (*ptr >= 'A' && *ptr <= 'Z') ||
        (*ptr >= 'a' && *ptr <= 'z') ||
        *ptr == '_')
    

    A better solution is to use isalnum.

    if (isalnum(*ptr) || *ptr == '_')
    

    Be aware that different locales may consider different characters to be alphanumeric.

    A few more issues with your code:

    • You could work out the size of the string you need before allocating the memory for it, to avoid overallocating.
    • You can build the result without using strcat by keeping a pointer to where you have reached so far.
    • I don’t like that call to free inside the function. You can’t be sure that the string passed in as a parameter was allocated using malloc.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there better way to delete a parameter from a query string in a
I'm trying this with javascript, but it's possible there is an easier/better way. I
Is there better way to enumerate all photos on the device than this one?
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't
Is there a better way to format data uniformly than to store data as
Is there a better way of writing the following for loop? my_list = []
Is there a better way to write the following function? Having the '#' +
Is there a better way to do this for-loop? for i = find(A >
Using the standard VS IDE, is there a fast way to create class properties

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.