Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3331534
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:35:38+00:00 2026-05-17T23:35:38+00:00

Is there a better way for getting the field_name value from a IDataRecord only

  • 0

Is there a better way for getting the field_name value from a IDataRecord only if the field_name exists in the IDataRecord, currently I’m using a try{…} catch{…} block, but this is some kind of On Error Resume next. Some alternatives?

/// <summary>
/// Returns column value from IDataRecord only if field_name exists.
/// </summary>
public static Tresult ValueIfExists<Tresult>(this IDataRecord record, string field_name)
{
    try { return record.Value<Tresult>(record.GetOrdinal(field_name)); }
    catch { return default(Tresult); }
}

/// <summary>
/// Returns column value from IDataRecord accecing by index.
/// </summary>
public static Tresult Value<Tresult>(this IDataRecord record, int field_index)
{
    return record.IsDBNull(field_index) ? default(Tresult) :
              (Tresult)Convert.ChangeType(record[field_index], typeof(Tresult));
}

I have changed my ValueIfExists function to reflect your ideas, so it looks like this:

public static Tresult ValueIfExists2<Tresult>(this IDataRecord record, string field_name)
{
    for (int index = 0; index < record.FieldCount; index++)
    {
        if (record.GetName(index).Equals(field_name, StringComparison.InvariantCulture))
        {
            return record.Value<Tresult>(record.GetOrdinal(field_name));
        }
    }
    return default(Tresult);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:35:38+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:35 pm

    You are right that exceptions should not be used for normal program flow.

    The GetOrdinal method is intended for situations where you know what fields you get, and if a field is missing that is an error that should result in an exception.

    If you don’t know which fields you get in the result, you should avoid the GetOrdinal method. You can instead get all the names and their index into a dictionary that you can use as replacement for the GetOrdinal method:

    public static Dictionary<string, int> GetAllNames(this IDataRecord record) {
      var result = new Dictionary<string, int>();
      for (int i = 0; i < record.FieldCount; i++) {
        result.Add(record.GetName(i), i);
      }
      return result;
    }
    

    You can use the ContainsKey method to check if the name exists in the dictionary, or the TryGetValue method to check if the name exists and get it’s index it does in a single operation.

    The GetOrdinal method first does a case sensetive search for the name, and if that fails it does a case insensetive search. That is not provided by the dictionary, so if you want that exact behaviour you would rather store the names in an array and write a method to loop through them when you want to find the index.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there better way to delete a parameter from a query string in a
Is there a better way for getting rid of accents and making those letters
Is there a better way of getting this result? This function fails if num
Is there better way to enumerate all photos on the device than this one?
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't
Is there a better way to format data uniformly than to store data as
Is there a better way of writing the following for loop? my_list = []
Is there a better way to write the following function? Having the '#' +
Is there a better way to do this for-loop? for i = find(A >

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.