Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 458693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T22:41:50+00:00 2026-05-12T22:41:50+00:00

Is there a better way of writing this code? It just doesn’t sit right

  • 0

Is there a better way of writing this code? It just doesn’t sit right with me, I feel like there is something really ‘rails like’ that I should already know:

belongs_to :parent_in_use
belongs_to :parent_template

def after_create
  new_parent_in_use = ParentInUse.create!(self.parent_template.attributes)
  self.update_attribute(:parent_in_use_id, new_parent_in_use.id)
end

After creating a record I am taking the selected parent template and creating a parent_in_use record based on it. This way the template can change and the in_use record will live with my object forever. Both the ParentInUse and ParentTemplate classes inherit from Parent using STI.

I’m sure this should be simple enough but I don’t know how to do it, basically I would like to create the and assign the record in one operation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T22:41:50+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:41 pm

    This will do what you’re looking for.

    def after_create 
      self.parent_in_use = ParentInUse.create!(parent_template.attributes)
    end
    

    However without other changes it won’t do you any good. Because the foreign key is stored in the current model, ActiveRecord won’t save the change if this association is created by an after_create call back. The new ParentInUse object will be saved, but the database row for the current model will not be updated with that corresponding parent_in_use_id.

    Call it as a before_create call back and things will go more smoothly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a better way to flash a window in Java than this: public
Is there a better way to do this? -(NSDate *)getMidnightTommorow { NSCalendarDate *now =
Is there a better way for writing a condition with a large number of
Is there a better way to forcefully disconnect all users from an Oracle 10g
Is there a better way of binding a list of base class to a
Is there a better way to debug JavaScript than MS Script Editor? I am
Is there a better way than simply trying to open the file? int exists(const
Is there a better way to negate a boolean in Java than a simple
Is there a better way to watch for new entries in a table besides
Is there a better way to do the following: $array = array('test1', 'test2', 'test3',

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.