Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7052917
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:26:29+00:00 2026-05-28T03:26:29+00:00

Is there a better way to ensure resources are properly released – a better

  • 0

Is there a better way to ensure resources are properly released – a better way to write the following code ?

        val out: Option[FileOutputStream] = try {
          Option(new FileOutputStream(path))
        } catch {
          case _ => None
        }


        if (out.isDefined) {

          try {
            Iterator.continually(in.read).takeWhile(-1 != _).foreach(out.get.write)
          } catch {
            case e => println(e.getMessage)
          } finally {
            in.close
            out.get.flush()
            out.get.close()
          }

        }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:26:30+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:26 am

    Something like that is a good idea, but I’d make it a method:

    def cleanly[A,B](resource: => A)(cleanup: A => Unit)(code: A => B): Option[B] = {
      try {
        val r = resource
        try { Some(code(r)) }
        finally { cleanup(r) }
      } catch {
        case e: Exception => None
      }
    }
    

    (note that we only catch once; if you really want a message printed in one case and not the other, then you do have to catch both like you did). (Also note that I only catch exceptions; catching Error also is usually unwise, since it’s almost impossible to recover from.) The method is used like so:

    cleanly(new FileOutputStream(path))(_.close){ fos =>
      Iterator.continually(in.read).takeWhile(_ != -1).foreach(fos.write)
    }
    

    Since it returns a value, you’ll get a Some(()) if it succeeded here (which you can ignore).


    Edit: to make it more general, I’d really have it return an Either instead, so you get the exception. Like so:

    def cleanly[A,B](resource: => A)(cleanup: A => Unit)(code: A => B): Either[Exception,B] = {
      try {
        val r = resource
        try { Right(code(r)) } finally { cleanup(r) }
      }
      catch { case e: Exception => Left(e) }
    }
    

    Now if you get a Right, all went okay. If you get a Left, you can pick out your exception. If you don’t care about the exception, you can use .right.toOption to map it into an option, or just use .right.map or whatever to operate on the correct result only if it is there (just like with Option). (Pattern matching is a useful way to deal with Eithers.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a better way to ensure that I don't delete the last record
Is there better way to delete a parameter from a query string in a
Is there better way to enumerate all photos on the device than this one?
Is there a better way in C or C++, or just mathematically in general,
Is there a better way to flash a window in Java than this: public
Is there a better way to forcefully disconnect all users from an Oracle 10g
Is there a better way of binding a list of base class to a
Is there a better way to do this? -(NSDate *)getMidnightTommorow { NSCalendarDate *now =
Is there a better way to debug JavaScript than MS Script Editor? I am
Is there a better way than simply trying to open the file? int exists(const

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.