Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 180267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:33:22+00:00 2026-05-11T14:33:22+00:00

Is there a better way to require that an argument is not null in

  • 0

Is there a better way to require that an argument is not null in a method? I keep checking if any of the arguments that my method requires are null, as show below. But I’m wondering if there is a better way.

public void MyMethod(string a, int b) {    if(a==null){throw new ArgumentNullException('a');}    if(b==null){throw new ArgumentNullException('b');}     //more stuff here } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:33:22+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:33 pm

    Rick Brewster (author of Paint.NET) blogged about a Fluent API alternative:

    http://blog.getpaint.net/2008/12/06/a-fluent-approach-to-c-parameter-validation/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there better way to delete a parameter from a query string in a
Is there better way to enumerate all photos on the device than this one?
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't
Is there a better way to format data uniformly than to store data as
Is there a better way of writing the following for loop? my_list = []
Is there a better way to write the following function? Having the '#' +
Is there a better way to do this for-loop? for i = find(A >
Is there a better way to list counter properties for a particular process: $pids
Is there a better way to handle my FindAdjacent() function for my A Star

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.