Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1069545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:26:07+00:00 2026-05-16T20:26:07+00:00

Is there a big performance difference between those two sql count statements, when performing

  • 0

Is there a big performance difference between those two sql count statements, when performing large counts (large here means 100k + records)

first:

SELECT count(*) FROM table1 WHERE <some very complex conditions>

second:

SELECT count(*) FROM (SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE <some very complex conditions>) subquery_alias

I know that first approach is right, but i want to know is this statements will perform similar ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:26:08+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    The query optimizer will most likely transform your second query into the first one. There should be no measurable performance difference between those two queries.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Performance wise, is there really a big difference between using: ArrayList.contains(o) vs foreach|iterator LinkedList.contains(o)
I am reviewing a big java application to see if there are any performance
Do you think there is a big difference in for...in and for loops? What
I want to POST an URL using CURL and php. There is a big
Is there a master list of the Big-O notation for everything? Data structures, algorithms,
With a seriously big .NET site/solution (100's of assemblies), are there any tools available
TextMate may be the best editor out there, but is has a big disadvantage:
There are two weird operators in C#: the true operator the false operator If
Server virtualization is a big thing these days, so I'm tasked at work to
I am trying to convert an int into three bytes representing that int (big

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.