Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 727979
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:37:44+00:00 2026-05-14T06:37:44+00:00

Is there a cleaner way to do the following, assuming that I have a

  • 0

Is there a cleaner way to do the following, assuming that I have a reason to keep the data sets independent?:

x = {1, 2, 3};
y = {1, 4, 9};

ListPlot[Partition[Riffle[x, y], 2]]

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:37:44+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:37 am

    I do not think Timo’s solution is standard.
    Here are two methods, using Transpose or Thread, that I have often seen used.

    x = {1, 2, 3};
    y = {1, 4, 9};
    Transpose[{x, y}]
    Thread[{x, y}]
    

    Output:

    {{1, 1}, {2, 4}, {3, 9}}
    {{1, 1}, {2, 4}, {3, 9}}
    

    Both of these methods avoid explicitly referencing the length of your data which is plus in my book.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I thought about using the following code, but is there any cleaner way? Process
Is there a cleaner way to do something like the following in clojure? (defn
Is there a cleaner way for me to write debug level log statements? In
I need to read a file in MB chunks, is there a cleaner way
I'm familiar with: Convert.ToInt32(texthere); But is there another cleaner way to do it? I
I'm wondering if there is a cleaner way to pass multiple variables in a
Is there a more Ruby-ish and cleaner way to get a number to operate
I wanted to see if there is a cleaner and more effective way of
Is there any more efficient,cleaner and shorter form for following: if($x==null or $y==null or
I'm trying to find out if there's a cleaner way to write something like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.