Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7697113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T21:56:07+00:00 2026-05-31T21:56:07+00:00

Is there a concise equivalent of SQL’s IN in ruby? I’d like to check

  • 0

Is there a concise equivalent of SQL’s IN in ruby?
I’d like to check equality of a string against multiple options: a, b or c in one conditional expression.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T21:56:09+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:56 pm

    There’s #include?, but that’s the other way round ([a,b,c].include?(c)).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a concise list of SQL Server stored procedure errors that make sense
Is there any Ruby equivalent for Python's builtin zip function? If not, what is
Are there regular expression equivalents for searching and modifying tree structures? Concise mini-languages (like
Is there a concise way to select the nextval for a PostgreSQL sequence multiple
In MATLAB, is there a more concise way to handle discrete conditional indexing by
Is there a concise way to define properties in a ViewModel for data binding
Possible Duplicates: Finding duplicate files and removing them. In Python, is there a concise
Is there a more concise/standard idiom (e.g., a JDK method) for piping an input
There are a few ways to get class-like behavior in javascript, the most common
I seem to handle special cases like this somewhat frequently. There's got to be

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.