Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8413631
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T00:57:21+00:00 2026-06-10T00:57:21+00:00

is there a correct or accepted way to deal with assert failure in debug

  • 0

is there a correct or accepted way to deal with assert failure in debug / release mode?

For instance:
let’s say I have a function that returns a std::vector

I expect the length of the returned vector to be equal to another object’s, and I do this:

std::vector<int> v = get_stuff();
ASSERT(v.size() == this->size() )
a = v[this->size() - 1 ];

now this code will work fine if no assertion is triggered, and in debug this could crash but at least I would have the assertion failure warning me that something is wrong.
The problem would be in release mode, where there would be a silent crash.
Does this mean that I have to also check for this error in the release code and then handle it? it’s possible but then I see no point in adding an assertion failure over it, since it is handled

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T00:57:22+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 12:57 am

    An assert has a different meaning than you appear to think. It’s not a substitute for an exception, which I think is how you think of it. It’s there so that you can spot trouble early on in debug. If you get the assert in debug, you fix it. Then you test. And then test again. And make sure the condition would hold in release. If it does… well, you’ve got a bug.

    Does this mean that I have to also check for this error in the release code and then handle it?

    If you expect it to happen, yes. Check the condition, throw an exception, and handle it delicately. Send an error report. Write to a log file. Update the software.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am wondering if there is a correct way to implement the anchor tag
Is there are a standard accepted way to byte-swap UUIDs for transmission over a
Is there a generally accepted way of overriding error (validation) messages from a gem/plugin
Is there a best practice or widely accepted way of structuring and validating data
Firstly I know that there are many question and solutions to correct thread marshalling
Is there a leak in this C code? Although the answer is coming correct,
in my page there are few hidden field which are filled with the correct
What do you think? Is this correct or are there memory leaks? Source: #include
I followed these instructions here: http://logback.qos.ch/consolePlugin.html I have the correct and found logback.xml, it
I have been gathering information in this site and others about the best way

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.