Is there a difference between this:
average = (x1+x2)/2;
deviation1 = x1 -average;
deviation2 = x2 -average;
variance = deviation1*deviation1 + deviation2*deviation2;
and this:
average2 = (x1+x2);
deviation1 = 2*x1 -average2;
deviation2 = 2*x2 -average2;
variance = (deviation1*deviation1 + deviation2*deviation2) / 4;
Note that in the second version I am trying to delay division as late as possible. Does the second version [delay divisions] increase accuracy in general?
Snippet above is only intended as an example, I am not trying to optimize this particular snippet.
BTW, I am asking about division in general, not just by 2 or a power of 2 as they reduce to simple shifts in IEEE 754 representation. I took division by 2, just to illustrate the issue using a very simple example.
There’s nothing to be gained from this. You are only changing the scale but you’d don’t get any more significant figures in your calculation.
The Wikipedia article on variance explains at a high level some of the options for calculation variance in a robust fashion.