Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 795077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:25:11+00:00 2026-05-14T22:25:11+00:00

Is there a easy way to skip the readLine() method in java if it

  • 0

Is there a easy way to skip the readLine() method in java if it takes longer than, say, 2 seconds?

Here’s the context in which I’m asking this question:

public void run()
{
    boolean looping = true;
    while(looping) {
        for(int x = 0; x<clientList.size(); x++) {
            try {
                Comm s = clientList.get(x);
                String str = s.recieve();
                // code that does something based on the string in the line above
            }
            // other stuff like catch methods
        }
    }
}

Comm is a class I wrote, and the receive method, which contains a BufferedReader called “in”, is this:

public String recieve()
{
    try { if(active) return in.readLine(); }
    catch(Exception e) { System.out.println("Comm Error 2: "+e); }
    return "";
}

I’ve noticed that the program stops and waits for the input stream to have something to read before continuing. Which is bad, because I need the program to keep looping (as it loops, it goes to all the other clients and asks for input). Is there a way to skip the readLine() process if there’s nothing to read?

I’m also pretty sure that I’m not explaining this well, so please ask me questions if I’m being confusing.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:25:12+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:25 pm

    The timeout alone is not a good idea. Use one thread per client (or use asynchronous I/O, but unless you’re building some high performance application, that’s unnecessarily complicated).

    As for the timeout itself, it must be done on the stream that’s encapsulated. See for example How can I set a timeout against a BufferedReader based upon a URLConnection in Java?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 405k
  • Answers 405k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Look at SQL distinct for 2 fields in a database… May 15, 2026 at 5:44 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Great News: SAP has announced release 3.0 of the SAP… May 15, 2026 at 5:44 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ok, I found out that the ID field is not… May 15, 2026 at 5:44 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.