Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4104436
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T21:07:04+00:00 2026-05-20T21:07:04+00:00

Is there a faster method for taking a random sub sample (without replacement), than

  • 0

Is there a faster method for taking a random sub sample (without replacement), than the base::sample function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T21:07:05+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 9:07 pm

    you can get a little bit of a speed-up by eliminating the base::sample function call:

    > x<- rnorm(10000)
    > system.time(for(i in 1:100000) x[.Internal(sample(10000L, 10L, FALSE, NULL))])
       user  system elapsed 
      2.873   0.017   2.851 
    > system.time(for(i in 1:100000) sample(x,10))
       user  system elapsed 
      3.420   0.025   3.258 
    

    Depending on your problem there may be other more clever ways of speeding up your code. Think about ways to replace many small calls to sample with one big one.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there scenarios where JIT compiler is faster than other compilers like C++? Do
Is there a better, more elegant (and/or possibly faster) way than boolean isNumber =
Is Protocol Buffer for .NET gonna be lightweight/faster than Remoting(the SerializationFormat.Binary)? Will there be
There is previous little on the google on this subject other than people asking
The fact that the replace method returns a string object rather than replacing the
Is there a faster way to perform this most simple query in terms of
Executive Summary: preg_replace() ran faster than string comparisons. Why? Shouldn't regular expressions be slower?
Does anyone knows how can I invoke method dynamically without reflection? I`ll try to
Is it possible to send form data to a PHP class' method rather than
Which of these pieces of code is faster? if (obj is ClassA) {} if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.