Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 834317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:39:14+00:00 2026-05-15T04:39:14+00:00

Is there a faster way to do this in python? [f for f in

  • 0

Is there a faster way to do this in python?

[f for f in list_1 if not f in list_2]

list_1 and list_2 both consist of about 120.000 strings. It takes about 4 minutes to generate the new list.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:39:15+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:39 am

    If you put list_2 into a set, it should make the containment checking a lot quicker:

    s = set(list_2)
    [f for f in list_1 if not f in s]
    

    This is because x in list is an O(n) check, while x in set is constant-time.

    Another way is to use set-difference:

    list(set(list_1).difference(set(list_2)))
    

    However, this probably won’t be faster than the first way – also, it’ll eliminate duplicates from list_1 which you may not want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently use: BufferedReader input = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(filename)); Is there a faster way?
I wondering if there is a faster (GPU time) way to draw a full-screen
Is there any way to replace titles faster then str_replace function? I've got a
Is there a way to stream video with opencv faster? i'm using Mat img;
Is there any equivalent of String.indexOf() for arrays? If not, is there any faster
I'm fairly new to C, not having much need to anything faster than python
The bellow code detects and converts urls in String. Is there faster way or
This is how I have been searching for objects in python. Is there any
Given a directed, connected graph with only positive edge weights, are there faster algorithms
Is there any benchmark or comparison which is faster: place nginx in front of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.