Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7720053
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T03:34:05+00:00 2026-06-01T03:34:05+00:00

Is there a GCC/g++ option that generates an error/warning if there’s a function that

  • 0

Is there a GCC/g++ option that generates an error/warning if there’s a function that has a non-void return value, but doesn’t contain a return statement in its definition?

E.g.:

int add(int a, int b)
{
    a+b;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T03:34:06+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 3:34 am

    -Wreturn-type. It’s enabled by -Wall (which you should always be running with, along with -Werror -Wextra).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

lint produces some warning like: foo.c XXX Warning 534: Ignoring return value of function
Is there any gcc option I can set that will give me the line
Is there a set of command-line options that will convince gcc to produce a
Is there a way to run the GCC preprocessor, but only for user-defined macros?
Is there a way to enable a hilighting scheme for gcc/g++ warning output? I'd
related to (gcc) Multi-Dim Array or Double Pointer for Warning-free Compile , is there
With GCC, when the -Wall -Wextra flags are enabled, one has the option of
is there a magic variable in gcc holding a pointer to the current function
Are there any free, GCC-compatible suites for Windows that generate standalone executables without external
Is there a gcc flag to skip resolution of symbols by the compile-time linker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.