Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 50847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:39:27+00:00 2026-05-10T16:39:27+00:00

Is there a Generics Friendly way of using Collection.EMPTY_LIST in my Java Program. I

  • 0

Is there a Generics Friendly way of using Collection.EMPTY_LIST in my Java Program.

I know I could just declare one myself, but I’m just curious to know if there’s a way in the JDK to do this.

Something like users = Collections<User>.EMPTY_LIST;

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:39:27+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    By doing the following:

    List<User> users = Collections.emptyList(); 

    The type of the returned list from Collections.emptyList(); will be inferred as a String due to the left-hand-side of the assignment. However, if you prefer to not have this inference, you can define it explicitly by doing the following:

    List<User> users = Collections.<User>emptyList();  

    In this particular instance, this may appear as redundant to most people (in fact, I’ve seen very little code out in the wild that makes use of explicit type arguments), however for a method with the signature: void doStuff(List<String> users) it would be perfectly clean for one to invoke doStuff() with an explicit type argument as follows:

    doStuff(Collections.<String>emptyList()); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 86k
  • Answers 86k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer IIS also shuts down your web app after a given… May 11, 2026 at 5:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Is there 2 tables : destination and language ? Is… May 11, 2026 at 5:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Found a blog post while searching over the net. Here… May 11, 2026 at 5:26 pm

Related Questions

I've written an application that handles most exceptions gracefully, with the page's design intact
So this post talked about how to actually implement url rewriting in an ASP.NET
I am working on code generation and ran into a snag with generics. Here
Is there a way to initialize all elements of an array to a constant

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.