Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6719839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T09:08:25+00:00 2026-05-26T09:08:25+00:00

Is there a good reason to manually remove event listeners from object’s events if

  • 0

Is there a good reason to manually remove event listeners from object’s events if the reference to the object is going to be lost?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T09:08:25+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:08 am

    Nope. If you’re looking at code which does this, it’s probably because someone’s read that events cause memory leaks, but not really understood why. (It’s when the event subscriber is prevented from being collected because the event publisher has a reference to it. In your case, it’s the publisher which is becoming eligible for garbage collection anyway, so that problem doesn’t apply.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a good reason for map to not read from @_ (in functions)
Is there a good reason why there is no Pair<L,R> in Java? What would
Is there a good reason (advantage) for programming this style XmlDocument doc = null;
Is there a good reason for this? It is a lame question, but I
Is there any good reason to disallow scriptlet or EL expression to be inserted
Put differently: Is there a good reason to choose a loosely-typed collection over a
If so, can the image be animated? Is there a good reason not to
Is there ever a good reason to not declare a virtual destructor for a
I was wondering if there is a good reason for ScriptReference not to override
I'm sure there is a good (or at least decent) reason for this. What

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.