Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4259822
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T05:50:14+00:00 2026-05-21T05:50:14+00:00

Is there a more compact/efficient way of doing this? for key in kwargs: if

  • 0

Is there a more compact/efficient way of doing this?

    for key in kwargs:
        if key == 'log':
            self.log = kwargs[key]
        elif key == 'bin':
            self.bin = kwargs[key]
        elif key == 'pid':
            self.pid = kwargs[key]
        elif key == 'conf':
            self.conf = kwargs[key]
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T05:50:14+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 5:50 am

    To achieve exactly what you asked for, you could use

    for key in ('log', 'bin', 'pid', 'conf'):
        if key in kwargs:
            setattr(self, key, kwargs[key])
    

    or

    self.__dict__.update((key, kwargs[key])
                         for key in ('log', 'bin', 'pid', 'conf')
                         if key in kwargs)
    

    However, I would generally prefer something like this:

    def f(log=None, bin=None, pid=None, conf=None):
        self.log = log
        self.bin = bin
        self.pid = pid
        self.conf = conf
    

    While this is still somewhat repetitive, the code is really easy to read. All attributes are intialized regardles of whether the corresponding keyword argument is passed in, and the signature of the function clearly documents the arguments and there defaults.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a more compact and/or conventional way to write this? With ActiveSheet.QueryTables.Add(Connection:=URL;http://carbon.brighterplanet.com/flights.txt, Destination:=Range(A2))
Is there anything more compact (or otherwise better) than this? <x:Array x:Key=titles Type=System:String> <System:String>Mr.</System:String>
Is there a more efficent way of doing this in terms of memory usage
Is there any way to make code more compact for this situation? // pseudocode
Is there a more compact way of comparing my bits than this (the only
Is there a more compact way of comparing my bits than this (the only
Is there a more compact way to do this sort of initialization? for (var
Is there a more efficient way to list files from a bucket in Amazon
I would like to know if there is a more compact (or Pythonic) way
Is there a way to assign attributes in a more compact manner I dont

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.