Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8232531
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T17:51:50+00:00 2026-06-07T17:51:50+00:00

Is there a more elegant way to initialise the second string with a single

  • 0

Is there a more elegant way to initialise the second string with a single char from the first string? Eg. without resorting to the string ( size_t n, char c ) constructor?

string first = "foobar";
string second(string(1, first[0]));
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T17:51:52+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 5:51 pm

    The constructor you mention is the way to create a string from one character, so there won’t be a significantly more elegant way. However, there’s no need to create and copy/move a temporary:

    string second(1, first[0]);
    

    Alternatively, you could construct from a substring of first:

    string second(first, 0, 1);
    

    In C++11, you can use an initialiser list:

    string second {first[0]};
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there an elegant way to make whitespace string. To be more precise, I'm
Is there more elegant way of escaping array elements: mysql_query(SELECT * from mytable WHERE
Is there a more elegant way to accomplish this. I have a string, where
Is there more elegant (less code) way of find a matrix OUT, with colSums(OUT)<=a
I'm wondering if there is a more elegant way to do this: $foo =
I was wondering if there is a more elegant way to do IN() queries
I'm a beginner in Flex so there must be more elegant way of doing
I would like to ask if there is a more elegant way to write
I was wondering if there was a more elegant way than this example to
Is there more elegant way of doing lazy evaluation than the following: pattern='$x and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.