Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 906763
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:26:35+00:00 2026-05-15T16:26:35+00:00

Is there a more performant way to concatenate 2-d arrays than this? static void

  • 0

Is there a more performant way to concatenate 2-d arrays than this?

  static void Main(string[] args)
    {

        int[][] array1 = { new int[] { 1, 2, 3 }, new int[] { 4, 5, 6 }, new int[] { 7, 8, 9 } } ;             

        int[][] array2 = { new int[] { 1, 2, 3 }, new int[] { 4, 5, 6 }, new int[] { 7, 8, 9 } };

        int[][] array3 = Concat(array1, array2);

    }

    private static int[][] Concat(int[][] array1, int[][] array2)
    {
        int array1Length = array1.Length;
        int array2Length = array2.Length;

        int[][] result = new int[array1Length + array2Length][];
        int i = 0;
        for (; i < array1Length; i++)
            result[i] = array1[i];

        for (; i < array2Length + array1Length; i++)
            result[i] = array2[i - array1Length];

        return result;    



    }

Edit:
I would like to know if that’s a good practice of deep concat of 2d array

        private static int[][] DeepConcat(int[][] array1, int[][] array2)
    {
        int array1Length = array1.Length;
        int array2Length = array2.Length;

        int[][] result = new int[array1Length + array2Length][];
        int i = 0;
        for (; i < array1Length; i++)
        {
            result[i] = new int[array1[i].Length];
            for (int j = 0; j < array1[i].Length; j++)
            {
                result[i][j] = array1[i][j];
            }
        }
        for (; i < array2Length + array1Length; i++)
        {
            result[i] = new int[array2[i - array1Length].Length];
            for (int j = 0; j < array2[i - array1Length].Length; j++)
            {
                result[i][j] = array2[i - array1Length][j];
            }

        }
        return result;

    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:26:36+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    You could use a linked list of int[] instead so you don’t need to re-allocate any new memory.

    See LinkedList<T>, or if it doesn’t perform exactly as you want for concat you can make your own easily.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there anything more compact (or otherwise better) than this? <x:Array x:Key=titles Type=System:String> <System:String>Mr.</System:String>
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
is there a more simple way to get combobox (WinForms) selected items text? string
Is there a more railsy way to do this query in rails 3? scope
Is there a better more performance way to write this jQuery selector using either
Is there more elegant (less code) way of find a matrix OUT, with colSums(OUT)<=a
There are more than one solution for finding the-number-of-digits in a given number. For
If there are more than one rows in my source that do not match
I'm wondering if there is a way to convert this so it would be
Is there a performant way in PHP to search for a file through multiple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.