Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8454077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T11:55:47+00:00 2026-06-10T11:55:47+00:00

Is there a one-line way to use include if the array it’s searching may

  • 0

Is there a one-line way to use include if the array it’s searching may not be assigned?

I’ve tried a lot of variants of

(foo || []).include?(:bar)

but without success

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T11:55:49+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 11:55 am

    If foo really is nil, as opposed to undefined, then (foo || []).include?(:bar) will do what you want, however if foo is not set to anything yet, then you will get a NameError so we can check for that with a longer oneliner…

    defined?(foo) ? (foo || []).include?(:bar) : false
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I promise you I am not lying. There is one strange line in this
Is there a one-line easy linq expression to just get everything from a simple
Say I have two files where there is one number per line File 1
I'm trying to make a HTML file with command line, but there is one
How could I merge these into one line? I'm sure it's possible. RewriteRule ^forums$
I have a file named file with three lines: line one line two line
Is there one method or property in the .NET Framework that tells if an
I'm looking for a standard dual-map structure - is there one implemented in std/boost/another
Network file systems are offered by Windows and (L)Unix. Is there one for IBM
There is one table. Parent_id references same table id. How insert raw if parent_id

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.