Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6925807
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T10:50:14+00:00 2026-05-27T10:50:14+00:00

Is there a pattern or best practice in Rails whereby we can specify, in

  • 0

Is there a pattern or best practice in Rails whereby we can specify, in one place, the names/symbols of params that are to be used in the API, so that we can reference it throughout our code and tests?

Our application entails a user passing in parameters to our API via HTTP POST. We use symbols to get at the values as follows:

first_name = params[:firstname]
last_name = params[:lastname]
...

We also set the values of params within our RSpec tests:

params = {
    firstname:      'John',
    lastname:        'Doe',
    ...
}

Obviously the above examples are rather simplistic, and in our application we have many more parameters. As such it would be good to have a definitive set of API parameters that can be used. The main benefit being that other developers can then know what parameters are available in the application. Furthermore, we want to safeguard against symbols being typed incorrectly.

My thinking at the minute is to use a module called API with some constants defined:

Module API
    FIRST_NAME = :firstname
    LAST_NAME = :lastname
    ...
end

We could then use the module as follows:

first_name = params[API::FIRST_NAME]
last_name = params[API::LAST_NAME]
...

Is this approach even correct? Will there be a performance cost?

Note: We will have the same parameters for every call. Furthermore, the parameters may change as we’re currently in the early stages of development and the final set of API fields along with their names haven’t been decided on yet.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T10:50:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:50 am

    It is likely your API will not have the same parameters for every call. Also, you probably won’t want to change the parameters frequently unless you are the only consumer of your API as changes in the API will break things for your customers. For these reasons I don’t think constantizing the params in a module is going to buy you that much.

    While there are plenty of places to try to remove redundant code, I’m doubting that your proposed strategy is going to work well for you in the long term. If you find you are repeating yourself a lot in your tests (which certainly happens with APIs), you may want to take a look at rack-test-rest, a gem which can take care of a lot of the pain of API testing.

    Basically it makes reasonable assumptions about arguments you don’t provide to keep you on track for code http status codes, responses, etc. Hope this helps!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any patterns or best practices that can be used to simplify changing
Are there any known design principles, best-practices and design patterns that one can follow
Is there a pattern OR 'a best practice' on creating user's friendly messages in
Is there a best practice pattern to model the following parent child relationship where
Can anyone suggest a pattern that can be used for writing a JavaScript API
I'm looking to identify a best practice or often used design pattern for WCF
Is Model-View-ViewModel the best pattern to use in WPF? Are there any downsides?
Is there a pattern that is good to use when saving and loading different
Is there a pattern that I could apply to refactor this code? The only
Is there a pattern, Xml structure, architecture technique we can use to create simple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.