Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4561368
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T18:03:52+00:00 2026-05-21T18:03:52+00:00

Is there a possibility in Java to get rid of the necessity to catch

  • 0

Is there a possibility in Java to get rid of the necessity to catch non-RuntimeException exceptions? Maybe compiler flags?

I know the reason why the catching is promoted, but want to do simple and straight tools that enforce their requirements. So if something can went wrong I don’t like to catch up but exit the application, crashing with a meaningful exception. Usually this ends up like:

try {
     connection.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
    throw new RuntimeException(e);
}   

which introduces 4 lines of code mess, and introduces the wrapping RuntimeException mess on error output. Sometimes it even motivate people to wrap large try ... catch (Throwable ..) blocks around anything, which is the likely cause for our beloved ‘Unknown error occured’ alert boxes…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T18:03:53+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 6:03 pm

    Is there a possibility in Java to get rid of the necessity to catch non-RuntimeException exceptions?

    For a checked exception, you can chose between catching the exception and declaring it in the method header as thrown.

    Maybe compiler flags?

    No. There are no compiler flags to relax this. It is a fundamental part of the language design. Relaxing the checked exception rules via a compiler switch would cause serious library interoperability problems.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any possibility of exceptions to occur other than RuntimeException in Java? Thanks.
I want to ask you if there is a possibility to program a Java
If I safe an Array and reload it, is there a possibility to get
In Java, it's possible to have methods inside an enum. Is there such possibility
I'm just wandering. Is there a possibility to execute makefile.in using a Java command?
There is a possibility to use C# library with Mono for Android from Java
Is there any possibility that GetPropInfo returns nil even if the given class is
Is there any possibility how to enumerate AppDomains within Process?
Is there any possibility to run Hyper-V Manager MMC SnapIn on Windows 2008 Web
I was always curious is there any possibility to overload function literal, something like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.