Is there a practical way for us to slowly evolve a WinForms application to WPF without creating a support nightmare for ourselves with strange interop scenarios?
Background info:
We have a large battleship gray WinForms application that is heavily used by an internal group of about 60-75 users. We’re starting to run into places where we could see some benefit from having the app in WPF, but it’s not enough to justify a large project to completely re-write it. All of the screens in the app are self-contained WinForms user controls and the WinForms app is just a shell that handles menuing, opening/closing forms, provides some shared helper methods, etc…
Thus far, the best idea we’ve had is to convert the shell application to WPF and then host the WinForms user controls inside it. We thought that we could then convert the user controls over time, tieing those changes to initiatives that have enough business value to support the additional work. I’m concerned about how well the interop works and how it will impact performance. I’m also concerned about how we transition to a new look for the app. It would seem odd to make the shell app look snazzy and then have old battleship gray user controls hosted inside it and it also seems odd to create the shell app in WPF and make it look just like it did in WinForms.
If one of the Caliburn, Prism, or another similar framework would ease the transition, we’d be open to exploring those options as well.
We were in a similar situation and chose the following path: At the beginning we started to host a few WPF windows in the application shell (still WinForms). Of course there was some visible difference but we reduced the difference deliberately by toning down the new windows. We figured that by the time we would convert the remaining windows/controls it will be easier to “upgrade” to a more vivid experience since the UI will be entirely WPF and we can involve a graphical designer to work their magic based on XAML.
We have now reached the point where the majority of the windows are WPF. We have started the process of converting the WinForms shell app into a WPF based shell application hosting the remaining WinForms. We sill have sort of dull colors but users have started to notice the difference and although it is small our users still like the incremental positive change. Not too long and we will retire the last WinForm. That will be the point when we let our graphical designers off the leash!
As to performance: I can certainly not make a general statement as it heavily depends on your particular controls/windows. In our product (several hundred windows) we haven’t found any significant performance issue related to the mix of WPF and WinForms.
We didn’t look into any of the frameworks, so I’m afraid I cannot comment on those.