Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6330335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T17:51:06+00:00 2026-05-24T17:51:06+00:00

Is there a prettier / less-verbose way to use iterators in C++? From the

  • 0

Is there a prettier / less-verbose way to use iterators in C++? From the tutorials I’ve seen, I either set up typedefs everywhere (which gets tedious to do for a lot of one-off for-loops):

typedef std::vector<std:pair<int, int> >::iterator BlahIterator;

or have verbose-looking for loops like:

for (std::vector<std:pair<int, int> >::iterator it = ... ) ...

Is there a better way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T17:51:08+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:51 pm

    With boost, you can use the FOR_EACH macro.

    typedef pair<int, int> tElem;
    BOOST_FOREACH( tElem e, aVector )
    {
        cout << e.first << " " << e.second << '\n';
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite
There is a directed graph having a single designated node called root from which
There are two intents on the receiver side which are called from the same
There is any way to set the generic type (T) of class in the
Is there a way to make my input buttons prettier? They looked wonderful on
Is there a way to make this prettier; if ($(#Input).text === A) { sOutput
Is there a way to get a prettier exception rather than one prefaced with
Is there a way to construct a new std::vector with uninitialized (non-zero) values or
Is there an easy way of JIT-ing C# code up front, rather than waiting
In numpy there is a function that makes arrays print prettier. set_printoptions(suppress = True)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.