Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7400071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T04:08:51+00:00 2026-05-29T04:08:51+00:00

Is there a short way to call a function twice or more consecutively in

  • 0

Is there a short way to call a function twice or more consecutively in Python? For example:

do()
do()
do()

maybe like:

3*do()
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T04:08:52+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 4:08 am

    I would:

    for _ in range(3):
        do()
    

    The _ is convention for a variable whose value you don’t care about.

    You might also see some people write:

    [do() for _ in range(3)]
    

    however that is slightly more expensive because it creates a list containing the return values of each invocation of do() (even if it’s None), and then throws away the resulting list. I wouldn’t suggest using this unless you are using the list of return values.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Short version: Is there way to achieve in Python the same effect achieved by
Is there a way in Javascript to define a function and immediately call it,
Is there a short way to check/get for least significant bit in a 32-bit
The short version: is there a way to to write an and or an
Short Version: Is there a/what is the suggested way to return error details to
Short of copying the entire .netbeans directory is there any way to transfer custom
Short of cutting and pasting, is there a way to sort the methods in
Short of recursing and comparing dates of files/directories, is there a better way of
Question in Short: Is there a way to hide the submission page of jQuery
Short question: is there a way to make a jsonp request to a server,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.