Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8780447
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T20:03:01+00:00 2026-06-13T20:03:01+00:00

Is there a shorter more elegant way to keep context within BackboneJS view? this.$el.find(this.itemViewContainer).sortable(destroy).sortable({

  • 0

Is there a shorter more elegant way to keep context within BackboneJS view?

    this.$el.find(this.itemViewContainer).sortable("destroy").sortable({
        connectWith:'.tasks',
        delay:140,
        revert:200,
        items:'li:not(.locked)',
        placeholder:'ui-state-highlight',
        start:_.bind(function (event, ui){this._sortStart(event, ui);}, this),
        receive:_.bind(function (event, ui){this._sortReceive(event, ui);}, this),
        stop:_.bind(function (event, ui){this._sortStop(event, ui);}, this)
    });

I am reffering to the:

  • start event
  • receive even
  • stop event

it is important that: this, event and ui will be passed to the inner view event.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T20:03:05+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:03 pm

    You can use _.bindAll to lock this to the view in your callbacks:

    bindAll _.bindAll(object, [*methodNames])
    Binds a number of methods on the object, specified by methodNames, to be run in the
    context of that object whenever they are invoked. Very handy for
    binding functions that are going to be used as event handlers, which
    would otherwise be invoked with a fairly useless this. If no
    methodNames are provided, all of the object’s function properties will
    be bound to it.

    and you could use it like this

    var V = Backbone.View.extend({
        initialize: function() {
            _.bindAll(this, '_sortStart', '_sortReceive', '_sortStop');
    
            this.$el.sortable("destroy").sortable({
                items: 'li:not(.locked)',
                start: this._sortStart,
                receive: this._sortReceive,
                stop:this._sortStop
            });
        },
    
        _sortStart: function(event, ui) {
        },
        _sortReceive: function(event, ui) {
        },
        _sortStop: function(event, ui) {
        }
    });
    

    http://jsfiddle.net/nikoshr/wAAZ5/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a more elegant/shorter/organized way of writing this bit of code? for (int
I'm wondering if there's a shorter way to write this: var x = 1;
Is there a way to make this line shorter? bool pass = d !=
As far as I know there is not a significantly more elegant way to
Is there a shorter (perhaps more pythonic) way of opening a text file and
Is there any more efficient,cleaner and shorter form for following: if($x==null or $y==null or
I would like to know if there any shorter expression exists, than this: '0000-00-00
string = Yellow puts string[1..string.length] -> outputs ellow Is there a shorter way to
All of my string delete's with regex use gsub, is there a shorter way?
Is there a better/shorter way to write the whoAmI method in the following code?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.