Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7982347
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T10:39:20+00:00 2026-06-04T10:39:20+00:00

Is there a significant performance hit if I keep adding member functions to a

  • 0

Is there a significant performance hit if I keep adding member functions to a class? When I use the class, I may only use a couple of the member functions together at once so I could in theory split the single class into a number of smaller classes with fewer member functions. Do I take a big performance hit by cramming a lot of functions into the same class?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T10:39:21+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 10:39 am

    No, it doesn’t matter.
    But presence of lot of public` api indicates that you should make sure you are following the Single responsibility principle if you are trying to have a good design.

    There should not be more than one reason for a class to change.

    If you design adheres to that, then its all good and cramming a lot of functions to the class is not going to do any bad in terms of performance.

    Some people might argue about performance hit if those functions are virtual however as long the purpose of those functions is to be overidden in the derived class then you should make them virtual, that is unless those functions are not being made virtual just for the sake of flexibility but on basis of a well thought design then go ahead and make them virtual.
    Performance hits shouldn’t be a concern its the price you pay for a functionality you want to have just that.

    Also, Only profiling can actually give you accurate indications about performance bottle necks without it, what you get is speculations or guesses on the basis of experience which always might not be truly indicative.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

(MYSQL) Is there any significant performance differences, or other reasons not to use the
I realize that there is a (Sometimes significant) performance hit for creating, assigning, copying,
Question: Is there a significant performance hit when assigning a variable to itself? Although
Is vm.runInNewContext considered black magic like eval ? Is there a significant performance difference
Is there a significant difference in performance between the two for relatively small post-backs?
Are there significant performance advantages to allowing IIS to spawn multiple worker processes per
Is there any significant performance problems between the two code snippets ? User user
Is there any significant difference in performance when you call [someObject performSelector:@selector(testMethod:) withObject:anotherObject]; vs
Are there significant performance differences (at runtime and/or compile time) between constructing and assigning
Are there any significant performance differences these two blocks of code? var element =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.