Is there a simple way of testing if the generator has no items, like peek, hasNext, isEmpty, something along those lines?
Is there a simple way of testing if the generator has no items, like
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Is there a simple way of testing if the generator has no items, like peek, hasNext, isEmpty, something along those lines?
The simple answer to your question: no, there is no simple way. There are a whole lot of work-arounds.
There really shouldn’t be a simple way, because of what generators are: a way to output a sequence of values without holding the sequence in memory. So there’s no backward traversal.
You could write a has_next function or maybe even slap it on to a generator as a method with a fancy decorator if you wanted to.