Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 195541
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:41:28+00:00 2026-05-11T16:41:28+00:00

Is there a way around this in SQL Server 2005? (It bugs me, and

  • 0

Is there a way around this in SQL Server 2005?

(It bugs me, and every time I encounter it I get in to a strop. But this is the first time I’ve had to deal with AND been on Stack Overflow. Please, save what little sanity I posess!)

DimensionTable:
id INT IDENTITY(1,1)

FactTable:
source_id INT NOT NULL,
target_id INT NOT NULL

I created a foreign key from “Fact.source_id” to “Dimension.id” and set it up with cascade delete and cascade update.

When I tried to do the same with “Fact.target_id” I got an error telling “oh no, no, no” as there are multiple paths for the cascade to follow.

There are no other foreign keys involved here, just the two I want to create. I can create the second foreign key Without the Cascade, but that seems quite poo to me. It’s a set of tables which are going to be maintained by hand (very rarely will they be touched, so the client won’t pay for a gui to do this.) A such a cascade delete/update would be Extremely useful, but only if it’ on Both fields. (I’m a sucker for consistency)

****whimper****

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:41:28+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    Yes, use an INSTEAD OF trigger. It’ll intercept the DELETE command and you can direct logic accordingly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 102k
  • Answers 102k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are using asp.net 2.0 then you must use… May 11, 2026 at 8:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can think of it as the Binary Search Algorithm.… May 11, 2026 at 8:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Don't use the Activator, which relies on a public constructor.… May 11, 2026 at 8:11 pm

Related Questions

In sql server 2005 , inside an update trigger is there a way to
My table has a timestamp column named RowVer which LINQ maps to type System.Data.Linq.Binary.
What is the best way to deal with storing and indexing URL's in SQL
Using T-SQL I've found that I can't use 'ALTER INDEX' with the table/index values
SELECT pe.prodtree_element_id prodID, pe.prodtree_element_name_s, li.line_name, av2.value FROM prodtree_element pe LEFT JOIN prodtree_link pl ON

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.