Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 978683
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T04:05:43+00:00 2026-05-16T04:05:43+00:00

Is there a way in C++ to construct your class such that given a

  • 0

Is there a way in C++ to construct your class such that given a pointer to your class you can instruct dynamic_cast<>() how to cast to another class for which you are wrapping the implementation? Would operator cast do the trick? Imagine I have an Abstract interface base class and derive a concreteA from this as well as concreteB, but concreteB wraps the interface to an object of type concreteA. If I get a request to cast to concreteA from concreteA, I’d like it to work:

class Abstract {
public:
  virtual void interface() = 0;

};

class concreteA : public Abstract {
public:
  virtual void interface();

};

class concreteB : public Abstract {
public:
  concreteB(concreteA &underlying)
    : _underlying(&underlying) {
  }
  virtual void interface();

  operator concreteA*() {
    return _underlying;
  }

private:
  concreteA *_underlying;

};

void
myTest() {
  concreteA myClassA;
  concreteB myClassB(myClassA);
  Abstract *abstract = &myClassB;
  concreteA *underlying = dynamic_cast<concreteA *>(abstract);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T04:05:44+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:05 am

    No. A dynamic cast is telling the compiler "I don’t want to change this object at all, I just want to attempt to look at it as if it were this other type, but don’t change it. If you have to change it, return NULL or throw an exception.". Dynamic cast is not going to attempt to perform any such conversions on your behalf. For that, you need static_cast or boost::lexical_cast.

    This is because the cast operator can either:

    • Reinterpret an existing object in a new way without changing it
    • Change an object in some way in order to coerce it to be another type, such as int -> short, or double -> int.

    and a single cast invocation can only do one of these, not both.

    For more information on the "dual" nature of the cast operator, you can see this article by Eric Lippert, which is aimed at C# but mostly applies to C++ as well.

    Specifically, you can see § 5.2.7 in the most recent C++0x draft — that behavior is not changed from C++03.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way I can construct an new object from the given object
Is there a way construct a predicate to filter by class type? I currently
Is there a way declaring new static variables outside of that class even if
Is there a way to have a private readonly field in a class that
For a json data as below is there any possible way to construct a
Is there any way to tell db4o to call class default constructor while activating
Is there a way to use mocks or fakes in your unit tests without
When defining a PHP class, which is preferred/best practice? Are there any key differences
Is there a way that I dont have to extract the tags I need
Is there a way to set the context for your DataService in WCF Data

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.