Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6138497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:52:33+00:00 2026-05-23T17:52:33+00:00

Is there a way in C++ to declare that a function has no side

  • 0

Is there a way in C++ to declare that a function has no side effects? Consider:

LOG("message").SetCategory(GetCategory()); 

Now suppose that the LOG macro in release builds creates a NullLogEntry object that has SetCategory() defined as an empty function. So basically the whole expression could (and should) be optimized away — expcept that, in theory, the GetCategory() call may have some side effects, so I guess the compiler is not permitted to just throw it away.

Another example could be a function template specialization that ignores some (or all) of its arguments, yet the compiler is not allowed to save the evaluation of such arguments at the call site due to possible side effects.

Am I right? Or can compilers optimize away such calls anyway? If not, is there a way to hint the compiler that this function has no side effects, so if the return value is ignored then the whole call can be skipped?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:52:33+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:52 pm

    There is no standard way of doing so, but some compilers have annotations that you can use to that effect, for example, in GCC you can use the __attribute_pure__ tag in a function (alternatively __attribute__((pure))) to tell the compiler that the function is pure (i.e. has no side effects). That is used in the standard C library extensively, so that for example:

    char * str = get_some_string();
    for ( int i = 0; i < strlen( str ); ++i ) {
        str[i] = toupper(str[i]);
    }
    

    Can be optimized by the compiler into:

    char * str = get_some_string();
    int __length = strlen( str );
    for ( int i = 0; i < __length; ++ i ) {
       str[i] = toupper(str[i]);
    }
    

    The function is declared in the string.h header as:

    extern size_t strlen (__const char *__s)
         __THROW __attribute_pure__ __nonnull ((1));
    

    Where __THROW is a no throw exception in case that it is a C++ compiler parsing the function, and __nonnull((1)) tells the compiler that the first argument should not be null (i.e. trigger a warning if the argument is null and -Wnonnull flag is used).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to declare a variable as Nullable in c#? struct MyStruct
Is there a way in Java to declare an enumeration whose values can be
Is there a way to find the name of the program that is running
My asp.net application has a function that returns the HTML for the navigation menu
Is there a way in PHP to overwrite a method declared by one interface
Is there way in next piece of code to only get the first record?
is there way thats i can preselect an item when the page loads or
Is there a way to enforce constraint checking in MSSQL only when inserting new
Is there any way to check whether a file is locked without using a
Is there a way to hide radio buttons inside a RadioButtonList control programmatically?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.