Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6757911
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T13:42:43+00:00 2026-05-26T13:42:43+00:00

Is there a way in C++ to write a concrete class which when another

  • 0

Is there a way in C++ to write a concrete class which when another class is derived from it, has a method which must be overriden. An abstract class allows the forcing of the derived class to create concrete versions of any abstract methods but what I want is a base class that enforces this but can also be used in its own right. I know an abstract method can also specify a default functionality but this still remains an abstract class which cannot be instantiated.

I also looked at the template method pattern but this doesn’t seem to be quite what I am looking for either.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T13:42:43+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:42 pm

    I will assume you are looking for a compile-time enforcing of this condition (thank you @Chad for pointing it out)

    There is no direct language-mechanism in C++ that I know of. I mean, there is not a reserved keyword to put in front of your method declaration that would achieve your desired goal.

    I think that what you say is pointing to a design problem in your software. Let’s say you want to force the foo() method to be reimplemented by all inherirhing classes in the following snippet

    class BaseButConcrete
    {
        ... //Common stuff
        ... //
    
        virtual void foo()
        { /*implementation that you do not want to be inherited, but will be...*/ }
    }
    
    class DerivedOtherConcrete : public BaseButConcrete
    {
        void foo()
        { /*different implementation, 
          but no obligation from compiler point of view*/ }
    }
    

    I can see no good design reason why all the common stuff could not be moved in an abstract base class. From what you describe, you do not want to inherit the foo implementation in Derived, so do not inherit that part ! Thus the very classic design should do the trick :

    class AbstractBase
    {
        ... //Common stuff has moved here
        ... //
        virtual void foo() =0;
    }
    
    class NotAnymoreBaseButStillConcrete : public AbstractBase
    {
        void foo()
        { /*implementation that should not be inherited,
          and that will not by design*/ }
    }
    
    class DerivedOtherConcrete : public AbstractBase
    {
        void foo()
        { /*different implementation, 
          now mandatory compiler-wise for the class to be concrete*/ }
    }
    

    This way, the common stuff is still shared among all your derived classes, and you keep what you do not want to inherit (i.e. the foo implementation) separated in classes not on the same inheritance path.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to write XMLEvent using XMLEventWriter at the location of another
Is there any way to Write files to App_Data under medium trust hack? Im
Is there a way to write an enumeration that can be extended. I have
Is there a way to write log4j logging events to a log file that
Is there an easy way write to a file asynchronously in Python? I know
Is there any way to write a Visual Studio Project file easy or do
Is there a way to write in Visual Studio in nice formated way the
Is there any way to write a valid header/link/image? Something like <a href=index.html><h1 id=logo>Company
Is there any way to write Shoes application using IDE (NetBeans for example)? I
Is there a way to write in a app.config file the information about endpoints?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.