Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 561801
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:29:16+00:00 2026-05-13T12:29:16+00:00

Is there a way to add a not null type column to a Postgresql

  • 0

Is there a way to add a not null type column to a Postgresql table without doubling its size on disk? If for instance I have a table with some columns defined, and I want to add a column I’d do the following:

alter table my_table add new_column int  
update table my_table set new_column = 0 
alter table my_table alter column new_column set not null

This, in effect doubles the space that is allocated for a table because of the way Postgresql works. Updates are creating new tuples that will be marked for reuse after this transaction finishes and vacuum does its job. If table is large in size (ie. few million rows) but very slowly growing or is almost constant in size those rows will never be reused, and only a ‘vacuum full’ or a full database backup and restore will reclaim space on disk. Is there a way to automatically add a column with some default value but without this behavior? For instance if there would be a way to lock a table and do the update then there would be no need for MVCC in this case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:29:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:29 pm

    do it in steps:

    1. alter table add new column
    2. alter table add default value for column
    3. update, but not whole table with 1 update statement, but issue it in like 10000 separate updates, each in its own transaction
    4. run vacuum every couple hundred updates, or better – autovacuum
    5. alter table set not null
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 403k
  • Answers 403k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the .attributes DOM property and loop through,… May 15, 2026 at 5:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Since your example is straight from the Autocomplete plugin page,… May 15, 2026 at 5:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer jQuery has a method for this purpose, fadeIn. See documentation… May 15, 2026 at 5:13 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.